Stupid Chrome browser extension blocking

Just when I thought about switching to Chrome (again), I’ve noticed Google blocked 3rd party extension installing. Ok, so I can’t install them anymore directly from webpages, I have to download them and drag them manually to Extensions page. Makes sense. Great, that worked! Except, it hasn’t. After browser restart, it has kindly notified me that it has (permanently and with no chance of exclusion!) disabled my 3rd party extension. Well piss off Google, I know you want to protect users, but stop fuckin dicking around with stuff THAT I install and approve myself. Every other god damn browser gives at least option to manually exclude stuff from being blocked, but no, they go full block whether you like it or not. Apparently this has been enforced since Chrome version 35.

So, I’ve found myself a good old EXE based alternative and fucked off the damn Chrome browser and returned to trusty Firefox. It might not be the fastest, but at least isn’t fuckin the most irritating one to use. What good is all the speed if you’re not allowed to do anything with it. Stupid Google.

Don’t ever say anything over Rolex on WUS

Oh wow what I’ve experienced today on WUS (What U Seek) forums. It’s a horology forum where you can talk about all sorts of time keeping devices. Just make sure you don’t comment anything negative over Rolex. A lesson I learned few hours ago and I was just absolutely shocked at how moronic some people are. Clearly the ignorant ostrich way of ignoring reality. Stick a head in the sand and pretend it’s all brilliant and flawless.

It was a thread about some guy getting hands on a new Rolex Sea-Dweller watch. We do that all the time, you buy a watch, make few wrist shots and post it with your opinions and experience. Other people join in the thread and you form a conversation. Nothing we haven’t done like billion times before for other brands like Bulova, Seiko, Orient, Casio, Sea-Gull etc. But those threads weren’t about Rolex. I’ve stated about stuff I don’t like on other watches before and it was just that. An opinion like any other and users accepted it normally. No one complained, no outrages, nothing. Neither did I when someone commented something they disliked about my watches. But not here…

I just commented the insane amount of text that Rolex puts on a dial. See a photo and judge for yourself why I said that…

This photo is property of Leicashot who is also the owner of this Rolex Sea-Dweller.

It has crown logo, “Rolex”, “Oyster Perpetual Date”, “Sea-Dweller”, “4000ft/1220m”, Superlative Chronometer” and “Officially Certified” on a dial. Oh and a SWISS MADE on the bottom. If I’d wanted a book, I’d buy one. So, apparently I’m not allowed to have an opinion that they use way too much text on the dial. Nope, not for Rolex.

Wouldn’t it look like billion times better if it only had crown logo and ROLEX on top and below just “SEA-DWELLER, 4000ft/1220m and Chronometer”. Just that and nothing else (i let them have the Swiss Made below as well because I’m nice). That was my opinion. And apparently 0% of population agreed. Yet I’ve seen countless times other users also complained over this very exact same thing. Apparently they were all banned from the WUS forum or something after that…

I just don’t see why they have to mention oysters and date on a watch dial where 90% of people don’t even know what oyster is supposed to mean on a watch and we can already see it has a date window there. So why double confirm what we already see with our healthy pair of eyes? And don’t get me started with the “Superlative” word there. That’s like designing a V12 turbo charged Ferrari and then write “Ferrari Superlative Fast F12″ on a back. It’s a fucking Ferrari, we already know it’s super fast either way. Why do you have to write that there and point out the obvious!? And what’s worse are people refusing to accept your comment about it and they flip out like I committed some sort of crime against humanity by commenting that. And among few it was also a moderator that did that. A person which is supposed to be neutral as Switzerland. I was like what the fuck dude, when he started basically threatening me to stop doing that through personal messages.

Apparently the forum is supposed to consist of only praises and positive things. Like there are only sunny days and grasslands filled with colorful butterflies and pretty colorful flowers. Did I mention the rainbow above it? Oh yes, it has to be there. Lets all live in a perfect world. There were already 6 pages of “Oh wow that’s a pretty Rolex this and that” and when I faced them with what it now seems like a really harsh reality (in a perfectly civilized manner mind you!), I was instantly flagged as Mr Negative bashing their beloved Rolex brand and then bunch of some lame ass accusations dropped in that I’m a Rolex hater and that they know it for sure (yet again I was like what the fuck). Seriously idiots, get a fucking life. I’ve never ever seen anyone flip out so badly about any other brand and I’ve commented things I don’t like about others in similar threads as well.

Do I happen to write Chinese or I sometimes just don’t understand some people who behave like they landed here from Jupiter… must be both.

Lexmark, you lazy fucks

Seriously Lexmark, you are one bunch of lazy fucks that don’t give a shit about what you sell. I have a Lexmark X3650 printer, sure it’s few years old but works just fine for what I need it. Or shall I correct myself, USED TO work till I updated Windows 8 to Windows 8.1 like ages ago but didn’t need the printer in the meanwhile. Now this fuckin thing won’t work at all because driver INF is detected as 3rd party and not signed. It was fuckin downloaded from Lexmark webpage and says it’s compatible with Windows 8 64bit (every other device that I’ve seen worked just fine even with vanilla WIn8 driver on Win8.1. Just not this one. So, why this bullshit!? Why give a fuck if it’s signed or not, it’s just a fuckin printer geez. Am I suppose to buy new printer all the time just because some fucks are too lazy to make a compatible driver for a device no one ever changes for as long as it works? Printers aren’t friggin graphic cards that you change every half a year because they give better features and performance. It’s a fuckin ink jet printer that prints shit and that’s it. How fuckin hard can it be? Now I’m sitting in front of a PC trying to print something I urgently need and can’t because system refuses to accept fuck ass drivers no matter what I do. Well fuck you Lexmark, this was my first and also last printer that I bought from you. You incompetent lazy imbeciles.

Radeon resetting refresh to 85Hz on 144Hz monitor

Seriously AMD, can’t you do something right one fuckin time? Not long ago I had a problem of monitor not waking up when I pressed any key in standby. I had to re-connect DVI cable on my Radeon 7950 in order for screen to wake up. Now I’ve bought a proper gaming monitor from ASUS, the VG248QE monster with 144Hz and 1ms screen. Bought DisplayPort cable for it in order to use newest possible stuff for most problem free experience. Guess what, I have problems again. This one is even worse than occasionally monitor not waking up. Here, it wakes up just fine. Except it then gets stuck in a fuckin fixed 85Hz. If i check refresh rate settings, 85Hz is the highest option I can even select. I have to unplug DisplayPort cable and reconnect it. And then voila, I have a 144Hz monitor again. I usually notice this because either desktop or games just feels weird when it’s in 85Hz.

My main question is, why the fuck is this even happening? It’s not like 144Hz monitors are some mad exotic these days or am I really the only one noticing this issue and the rest of people just play at 85Hz without ever noticing it thinking they run at 144Hz all the time?

And what’s even worse is that I can’t fill in bug report because they are doing maintenance on it. Argh…

Bulova Accutron II 96B213

Here is one of the most amazing quartz watches I’ve seen in my life. In general I’m all for mechanical watches, because they are just the good old school machines, but here and there there are companies that surprise me with modern tech that blends perfectly to their heritage. Bulova has released watches with such movements in their Precisionist models range few years ago, but they were really big and dials were just too busy for my taste with so much stuff going on, it was just too much. But few weeks ago, Bulova introduced the new Accutron II range of watches, a true tribute to their original Accutron from the 1960’s that had a metal tuning fork instead of quartz crystal that we use these days.

What is so special about it? First thing you will notice on the above video is the fact that second hand doesn’t tick like it does on 99,99% of quartz watches. It’s gliding across the dial and that alone gives it such special feel. It will attract the looks with this alone for sure. And while most other watches would drain battery in no time, Bulova quartz watches with Precisionist movement will last for roughly 2-3 years on a single battery. Second thing about it is the fact that it’s incredibly accurate. Some a lot more expensive HAQ (High Accuracy Quartz) watches achieve this with built-in thermal compensation system that adjusts the quartz oscillation relative to the environment temperature, making them incredibly accurate. They are often accurate from +-5 to 10 seconds a year. Most casual consumer quartz watches are accurate within +-15 to 30 seconds a month. Bulova Accutron II models are accurate to +-15 to 20 seconds a year. And they achieve this not by thermal compensation, but with three prong quartz crystal oscillator (regular watches have only two prong quartz crystal) and much higher oscillation frequency. End result? Very accurate watch with a less than one fourth of the HAQ price. HAQ watches are usually around 1500 € where Accutron II models like the 96B213 that I own cost below 350 €.

Bulova 96B213 comes in a really nicely carved and polished stainless steel case. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such shapes on any other watch and I must say it looks really nice. On top of it is the domed mineral crystal. While I’d prefer a sapphire, especially on a watch that costs more than 300 €, but still, I forgive them a bit because it looks so nice.

Dial has a mild sunburst effect that changes slightly when you move the watch under the light. It’s nto as strong as the Bulova’s marketing photo suggests, but it still looks really nice. It comes in off white color dial paired with markers without any lume, but they are very legible in anything but absolute darkness. Watch hands are also very nicely made, super legible and they do have lume applied. The downside is that lume isn’t particularly bright which was a bit of a disappointment. Blue second hand doesn’t have the lume, but has a tiny tuning fork on the opposite end which I think it’s a nice touch. Date window and the date numbers are very big, so anyone can see them nicely and they also change rather quickly at the end of the day.

It comes with genuine black leather strap which looks a bit cheap and plasticky on Bulova’s marketing photos (which is strange), but is actually very high quality strap that comes pre-curved in a box so it fits the wrist perfectly straight away. Buckle is a traditional one, made of really chunky piece of stainless steel and again has the Bulova’s tuning fork logo. Nice touch, though it’s not carved into the stainless steel, but rather welded to the buckle. It’s nothing wrong with that, though I’ve noticed threads and my dog’s hair is getting stuck underneath it. Which is a bit annoying.

It’s a beautiful watch with really special quartz movement. It is a bit expensive to most people who aren’t into watches, but considering there are watches that cost 1500 € with nearly the same functionality, I’d say it’s a great value. And we haven’t even plowed into the Rolex territory with prices beyond 10.000 € or the likes of Patek Philippe that can cost even over 6 digit price figures. In Euros :) So yeah, like I said, great value.

Some more info and specifications:

Brand: Bulova
Model: 96B213
Movement: Accutron Precisionist
Accuracy: +- 15-20 seconds/year (estimated)
Dial color: off white with sunburst effect
Crystal type: Edge domed mineral crystal
Case material: stainless steel
Strap: non textured genuine black leather
Water resistance: 3 bar (30m or nearly 100 ft)
Power source: battery

Boycott Ubisoft

I’ve been wanting to write this for quite a while, but remained limited to forum rants only. This time I’m going “big”.

We all remember Ubisoft from the olden days. It was a game developer and publisher devoted to PC gamers with really good games and they also published several really good games like Far Cry, Dark Messiah of Might & Magic, The Elder Scrolls: Morrowind etc. I loved their games and I still own many of them (retail versions and also on GOG). Until something changed. They’ve became obsessed with protection of their games with all the wrong methods. First it was moronic StarForce protection that was known to cause idiotic problems with stuff not even related to game protected with it. Then they ditched it after the outrage by the gamers. Then they focused on what was even worse than StarForce. Their horrible always connected protection.

And that was the moment where I’ve decided not to buy a single game from them ever again from that point on. The games were unplayable on release day, because all the gamers connecting to their crap server simply DoS-ed it and with no connection, no playing. WTF!? What was even worse, when you did login to the game, started playing, connection was lost because of their crap servers and you were thrown out of the game, because no connection meant a non functional game. Thumbs up for that lads at Ubisoft.

And then they released their Uplay. A yet another game client in a line of many clients. Steam was first, fair enough. Then it was Origin. Fair enough, EA has been pushing it for a while even before the Steam with EA Downloader (EADM) which wasn’t the best thing out there, but since it wasn’t enforced to use it (you could install the game without it), I was fine with it. But we seriously don’t need the friggin’ third one. And it wouldn’t be such a problem as such if it wasn’t running on top of existing client. So, if you buy a game on Steam, you have to run Steam and also Uplay. WHY!? If you also release the damn game on Steam, use only their friggin’ framework. They also have copy protections, so why the need to run clients on top of other clients. Idiotic.

People who PAID for the games have to deal with all this nonsense. Guess how life was terrifyingly complicated for pirates who downloaded the game for free? Absolutely no problems. They games worked from first minute, they didn’t have to deal with stupid always connected nonsense back then and they still don’t have to deal with shitty Uplay. That’s a great reward for anyone who decides to actually pay for your shit Ubisoft.

And then there is their arrogance and faking of game graphics quality. Last one on the wall is Watch_Dogs. The game is filled with bugs, stuffed with stupid Uplay and worst of all, the graphics for PC were purposely and deliberately dumbed down to pathetic levels. And it doesn’t look anything like it was presented in teasers and trailers and in E3 show.

And this line of text snapped from their game code from Watch_Dogs shows how much they really care about PC gamers…


And then they have thrown out a large number of next gen effects that actually made the game really impressive looking and i wanted to buy it just because of that. So I could wander around Chicago in all the graphics beauty. It would be the first Ubisoft game I even considered buying after a long time boycott. Just to first find out about bugs and later on about this crap they pulled with graphics. So I just dropped it from my wishlist immediately.

Lets start with comparison of Watch_Dogs (2014) game with Mafia (2002). Pay attention that there are 12 years in between both games. There is no excuse not to include such “details” into a modern game if a game from more than decade ago has it. I know what it is, it’s the NVIDIA PhysX bullcrap Ubisoft decided to use to “improve” things. The “improvements” for everyone else are limited to quality of a game from year 1998…

And then there is what they showed us in trailers and E3 and what we actually got…

And this presentation:

You can just dream on to ever see such graphics on PC, especially not if you use AMD Radeon graphic card well capable of rendering full DirectX 11 feature set. That also includes the hyped HBAO which can just as easily be rendered on any Radeon.

What was the official Ubisoft response to this ridiculous downgrade?

“The dev team is completely dedicated to getting the most out of each platform, so the notion that we would actively downgrade quality is contrary to everything we’ve set out to achieve,” Ubisoft wrote. “We test and optimise our games for each platform on which they’re released, striving for the best possible quality.

“The PC version does indeed contain some old, unused render settings that were deactivated for a variety of reasons, including possible impacts on visual fidelity, stability, performance and overall gameplay quality.

Ok Ubisoft, should I spell you the word BUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLSHIIIIIIITTTTTTT ? Dedicated to getting most out of each platform? Really? How is it making a 2014 game look worse than it was showcased back in friggin’ 2012 a dedication of any sort? Why wouldn’t you just admit it was deliberately downgraded in graphics quality so that even current gen modern consoles wouldn’t look bad compared to what PC can do? After all Ubisoft is lately primarily a console only developer and I wouldn’t be surprised if this was actually true (and I strongly believe it is). Can’t see any other explanation for it.

And the game doesn’t contain “some old, unused render settings”, because you friggin’ removed it entirely. “deactivated for variety of reasons, including impacts on visual fidelity…”. It sure does affect it indeed. In a fuckin’ negative way. It looks like shit because of it. They’ve even added a line “This is PC only, who cares”. And then they have the balls to release such statement for the outrage by everyone who paid fuckin’ 49,99 € for this joke they call a game. Or 69,99 € for some sort of shitty digital “deluxe” version. Get fuckin’ serious Ubisoft.

I really don’t know what we gamers have to do to sober up these briefcase carrying tie wearing morons who don’t give a shit about gamers. Those gamers who made Ubisoft into what they are today. That’s right, like in so many cases, PC gamers build your company and now you’re screwing them without any Vaseline. Just because we don’t like stupid consoles, that doesn’t mean we are all bunch of thieves who steal every single game released. Having over 300 games on Steam, over 120 on GOG, over 10 games on Origin and over 50 retail physical discs. Yes, I’m a fucking thief.

Yet, I still refuse to buy any Ubisoft game because of everything I’ve said above. And I’ve been this way since their release of always connected crap. They have canceled it, yet their lame attitude was so bad I’ve decided to entirely boycott them. And not in a way that I’d still play their game obtained from warez scene. No, I ignore their stuff entirely. Like it doesn’t even exist for me. And more people should follow my example. You’ll soon notice you don’t really miss their games at all, because there are so many other still honest developers and publishers who deserve your money more. And they also release just as good if not a lot better games. When I say EA also falls into this group of good developers, you can see I am dead serious.

We don’t need your shit. Think about your marketing strategy again and once you make it right again, I’ll be the first one to write praises and compliments and not just piss over the Ubisoft name and logo. Yes, I will write about that if it ever happens. And I’ll be all mister positive. But with their current direction I just don’t see it happening in my lifetime…

Until then, Ubisoft, F & U.

Paint.NET 4.0 released!

Paint.NET has been my favorite image editing tool for years. And after ages long development cycle (lets face it, it’s developed by a single person as far as I remember, so I’m not gonna blame them for that). Interface wise it hasn’t change much and if I’m honest, there is no need for that. But it has gained few extra settings, a bit re-arranged GUI and many under the hood features like GPU hardware acceleration for effects. And best of all, it’s free. If you don’t need all the features of Adobe Photoshop, but you need a capable image editing power tool, this is it. It’s simple to use, has all the features average or even power user will need and it just works. And I love it because of that. It’s a must have app for any PC.