Tag Archives: Kotaku

Games are not “ableist” at all!

I’m absolutely sick of this clickbait nonsense by games “journalism”. What is games journalism even around for, if their sole purpose is shitting on their own industry and their own readers? Has anyone ever seen car industry journalism pissing all over all cars, its users and manufacturers? Ever seen sports media pissing over all sports to generate clicks? But here, to no one’s surprise, Kotaku and many other stupid outlets are doing just that. Again.

PokemonGo_Is_Ableist_by_Kotaku.JPG

Their latest jab at the games is of course, calling Pokemon Go “ableist”. Pokemon Go, the phenomenon that mobilized millions of Pokemon fans and gamers to actually go outside. You know, something everyone has been screaming and bitching about for decades how “gamers only dwell in their basements, playing games”.

Ableism

“Ableism” is another buzzword created by progressive regressive left to shame people who don’t happen to have any life changing disabilities. Instead of elevating and helping people with disabilities, lets take a piss at healthy people, like it’s their fault they are healthy and able to navigate through the world without limitations.

Games make disabilities irrelevant

I’ve been saying this for years and I’ll say it again. Games are one of rare few things in this world that don’t care what your gender is, what your sexual preferences are, what skin color you have or what disabilities you happen to have. Naturally, there are always limitations when it comes to interaction with the medium, but computer games are way more forgiving than most of other activities. I know of one disabled boy who could only move his head and ingenious people found a way to somehow make The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim game playable for him. Now tell me if that isn’t cool or what?

But idiots at Kotaku prefer to put down that one single game that doesn’t specifically cater to disabled people and dismiss and ignore 99% of all other games that bring joy and virtual mobility to millions of people with physical (and mental) disabilities.

You don’t have legs but you’d love to play football, run and climb? You can play FIFA or PES (Pro Evolution Soccer) or run and jump around with insane parkour moves in Mirror’s Edge or Tomb Raider. You have severely limited ability to move your arms in shoulder and elbow joints, but you want to be a basketball superstar? If you can at least move fingers and wrist, you can play many basketball games. Are you not allowed to drive a car because of severe eyesight problems? You can play any of the many Need for Speed games risk free or even go more serious with racing simulations like Gran Turismo and Forza motorsport on consoles or different “indie” racing simulators on PC. Do you have social anxieties like fear of crowds or open spaces or you just feel uncomfortable around people? Many of people with such conditions can play games online with other real people because the game is their comfort zone barrier, keeping them “safe”.

Hell, even if you don’t have any specific desires or preferences, games bring disabled people the unimaginable experiences and mobility otherwise not possible in real world. If some part of them is still functional, there is a chance someone will figure out how to make a game functional for them. And once we will manage to control games with our mind directly, we’ll remove even that last barrier. I know it’ll never actually be the same, but thanks to technology, this is the closest thing we can get. And if it’s so engaging to us able people, imagine how life changing it is for people with disabilities.

Pokemon Go is not as discriminating as Kotaku says it is

And to show games and gamers know no barriers or disabilities, here is a tweet I’ve seen today…

PokemonGo_Humanity.png

I don’t play Pokemon Go and I don’t know exactly how it works, but seeing this kinda made me shed a tear. Players remembered not everyone can run around and “catch ’em all” and dropped this message and made it possible for kids in hospitals to enjoy the Pokemon Go frenzy. It’s just so beautiful!  :3 Where there is a will, there is a way!

Why is Kotaku bitching and complaining about this instead of rather posting such positive message to large audience they have and make the change themselves? Of course, outrage brings more clicks than a normal article asking players to join forces, helping children in hospitals. Games journalism, never change. Never change… You’ll just disappear into nothingness. But gamers will still be around. Go gamers! Catch ’em all! 🙂

 

 

Advertisements

Objectivity is a silly thing to strive for

I’ll just pop in the image to get things started…

objectivityJason Schreier is a news editor at Kotaku. The very same Kotaku that is refusing to change their ethics code as per GamerGate demands. And now we know why… The thing that bothers me is, what is your purpose then if you don’t at least strive for objectivity, even if you don’t always achieve it? Especially if you just say “fuck it” from the get go?

I’m just a (nobody) blogger, forum reviewer and while I might not always be objective, at least I strive for that. After all, when I write a hardware or game review, people usually want to know OBJECTIVE information about it based on my otherwise subjective experience. You can and always will mix in personal feelings and have some sort of bias towards it. Especially if the thing you were testing and using is a good product (in my case since I don’t have any connections with anyone). You tend to overlook the negatives when there are so many positive points about it. But as you are reviewing or describing your experience, after you write down all the positive things, you have to stop and just think about things that could be better or different. It’s not really a difficult thing to do you know. But is a lot hard to do, if you have the guts to say “Objectivity is a silly thing to strive for” as your basic rule as journalist of any sort, even if you just write tabloid grade stuff or a home-brewed blog project. Dude, what the hell were you thinking when you spewed out those words? That’s basically like saying I have zero credibility or interest for any kind of objectivity. Dear reader, what the fuck are you still doing here? That’s what my opinion would be reading your words Jason. And that’s exactly what I think.

I don’t know, but is it just me who thinks that gaming or computer industry in general has no place for yellow journalism? This stuff isn’t and shouldn’t be gossip crap tabloids throw out day after day, glorifying spoilt celebrities for the brainless masses to enjoy (somehow). When you’re looking for a game or piece of hardware to buy, information surrounding the computer and gaming industry as a whole, massive majority is interested in facts, not biased and bribed opinions. Before I buy a game I want to know if it’s really any good and what are its downsides. Not who fucked who to get it in the spotlight. Unless that is what brought it into the spotlight. And that’s why GamerGate is raging about ethics in gaming journalism. All the bias, corruption, under the table deals and lack of any kind of objectivity and ethics. Because if you’re doing this kind of stuff, it clearly shows you lack ethics.

Stop being a dick and be honest. Honesty is a highly valued virtue and people tend to forget that way too often. Especially those who work as journalists…